DL Life Logo March 23, 2013 - - - - 117,280 AMERICANS ARE CANDIDATES ON THE UNOS TRANSPLANT WAIT LIST DL Life Logo 95,578 waiting for a kidney DL Life Logo 15,712 wait-listed for a liver DL Life Logo 1,189 waiting for a pancreasDL Life Logo 2,136 needing a Kidney-PancreasDL Life Logo 3,490 waiting for a life-saving heartDL Life Logo 1,668 waiting for a lungDL Life Logo 50 waiting for a heart-lungDL Life Logo 257 waiting for small bowelDL Life Logo One organ donor has the opportunity to save up to 8 lives DL Life Logo One tissue donor has the opportunity to save and -or enhance the lives of 50 or more individuals DL Life Logo You have the power to SAVE Lives by becoming an organ, eye and tissue donor, so what are you waiting for? To learn how to register click HEREDL Life Logo

Monday, September 19, 2011

Face transplants starting to gain acceptance

American Medical News | Kevin B. O'Reilly

Ethical -- and often visceral -- objections to the surgery are fading in light of dramatic early successes that restored patient functioning.
Facial transplantation once spawned science fiction-fed visions of cosmetic surgery run amok but is becoming more common as many fears about the operation prove unfounded.

There have been at least 17 facial transplants worldwide since the first was performed in 2005 for Frenchwoman Isabelle Dinoire, experts say. Three transplants have been done this year at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, the most recent one in May for Charla Nash, a Connecticut woman mauled by a chimpanzee in 2009. The hospital's efforts are being supported by a $3.4 million Defense Dept. grant, with hopes that wounded veterans will benefit.

In the surgery's earliest days, critics argued that the face -- so central to how people perceive themselves and others -- was not fit for transplantation. Donor families might be disgusted to see the face of their loved one on someone else's body. Critics also worried that a highly visible failure could horrify the public and discourage organ donation.

More commonly, skeptics of the surgery argued that it was wrong to treat nonfatal medical problems with an intervention that would subject patients to the increased risks of infection, cancer and renal failure that come with the immunosuppressive regimen required to avoid rejection.

No comments: