DL Life Logo March 23, 2013 - - - - 117,280 AMERICANS ARE CANDIDATES ON THE UNOS TRANSPLANT WAIT LIST DL Life Logo 95,578 waiting for a kidney DL Life Logo 15,712 wait-listed for a liver DL Life Logo 1,189 waiting for a pancreasDL Life Logo 2,136 needing a Kidney-PancreasDL Life Logo 3,490 waiting for a life-saving heartDL Life Logo 1,668 waiting for a lungDL Life Logo 50 waiting for a heart-lungDL Life Logo 257 waiting for small bowelDL Life Logo One organ donor has the opportunity to save up to 8 lives DL Life Logo One tissue donor has the opportunity to save and -or enhance the lives of 50 or more individuals DL Life Logo You have the power to SAVE Lives by becoming an organ, eye and tissue donor, so what are you waiting for? To learn how to register click HEREDL Life Logo

Sunday, January 15, 2012

MLK, Civil Rights and Denying a Kidney Transplant

Jewish Journal | Michelle K. Wolf

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. 

~Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

As I was thinking about how exactly to make a connection between Martin Luther King Jr. and disabilities/special needs, along came a blog post from Ellen Seidman over at Love That Max, quoting from blogger Chrissy Rivera about her daughter, Amelia, a 2-year with a rare genetic condition whose doctor at Children’s Hospital Philadelphia (CHOP) has recommended that her daughter not receive a kidney transplant largely because Amelia is “mentally retarded.” You can read Chrissy’s post here.

Without this kidney transplant, Amelia will die within six months to a year.

It’s unbelievable that in 2012, this could happen, and yet cognitive ability is apparently part of the standard criteria in deciding who gets (or doesn’t get) an organ donation. (And in Amelia’s case, the family is willing to use a family donor, so the issue isn’t just the scarcity of viable organs).

It reminds me of that ugly chapter in our American history when southern states were allowed to count slaves as 3/5 persons for purposes of apportionment in Congress (even though the slaves could not, of course, vote.). In CHOP’s approach, some people clearly “count” more than others.

What would MLK have done? Organized a protest in front of CHOP maybe, or called on the editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer to pen a strongly-worded editorial condemning this denial?

No comments: